ArticleJournal of motor behavior2026
Misalignment Between Perceived and Actual Ability on a Balance Beam Walking Task.
Article in Journal of motor behavior, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Effective balance control is necessary for stability, but it is an individual's self-perceived balance ability that determines movement selection. Accurate self-estimations of balance are therefore essential to ensure that movement choices align with capability. This study examined collegiate athletes' perceptions of their balance ability on a clinically standardized Narrowing Beam Walking Task to examine (1) their initial perceptions of ability, and (2) how task experience improves the accuracy of self-perceived balance. Self-estimates of performance were taken at baseline (before trials), early-training (after two trials), and post-training (after a further eight trials). Actual task performance was quantified using the final eight trials. At baseline, athletes poorly estimated their ability: individuals with poorer performance tended to overestimate while higher-performing individuals underestimated. With practice, absolute estimate error decreased, indicating that task-specific exposure brought self-estimates into closer alignment to actual performance. These effects were consistent across sporting disciplines with varying balance demands, showing that effective balance control and frequent engagement in similar, but unrelated tasks, does not facilitate accurate self-perceptions of balance. Instead, task-specific exposure was required to refine balance estimates. These findings have implications for testing and rehabilitation in populations whose misjudgments of balance are associated with negative outcomes, such as falls.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.