ArticleThe Analyst2026
Infrared spectroscopy with statistical analysis and machine learning for cancer risk assessment in inflammatory bowel disease patients.
Article in The Analyst, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) undergo regular colonoscopic surveillance due to their elevated risk of developing colorectal cancer (CRC). However, current clinical, endoscopic and histopathological risk stratification methods can be limited in sensitivity and objectivity, highlighting the need for complementary molecular approaches. In this study, Attenuated Total Reflectance-Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (ATR-FTIR) was used to acquire mid-infrared (MIR) spectra from IBD-associated endoscopic biopsy samples (30 patients analysed; 10 who developed dysplastic pre-cancerous lesions and 20 who did not during long-term follow-up). Samples were stratified according to baseline clinical CRC risk (high/low) and subsequent pre-cancerous lesion development, enabling assessment of molecular signatures associated with future cancer risk rather than solely current disease status. Spectral variations were analysed using chemometric methods and machine learning classifiers. Principal component analysis (PCA) was performed to evaluate spectral separation, with the first three components (PC1, PC2 and PC3) accounting for 76.8%, 19.2% and 2.7% of the total variance, respectively. Hierarchical clustering analysis (HCA) further explored similarity patterns across defined spectral regions. Among the evaluated models, PLS-based classifiers achieved a balanced accuracy of 0.61-0.70 under repeated nested cross-validation; however, a permutation test indicated that this performance was not significantly above chance (
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.