ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2026
Co-Designing a Prototype Education and Training Intervention for Healthcare Professionals Working in Community Laryngectomy Care: An Experience-Based Co-Design Study.
Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionEvidence indicates that people with a laryngectomy often perceive community healthcare professionals as less knowledgeable than hospital-based clinicians. Some individuals also report feeling more skilled than the professionals supporting them at home. This highlights a substantial gap in healthcare professional education and training, with significant safety implications for people with a laryngectomy, including reduced confidence in care, mistrust in healthcare professionals, and risks to continuity of care. To address this, the present research describes co-design of a prototype education and training package for community healthcare professionals.
methodsInformed by the principles of Experience Based Co-Design and underpinned by the Medical Research Council's guidance for Complex Intervention Development we ran prioritisation events followed by three iterative workshops with people with a laryngectomy, family members and healthcare professionals to develop the prototype education and training package. A digital expert supported all workshops. A combination of content and thematic analysis was used to analyse workshop data.
resultsTwenty-eight participants took part in the prioritisation events and workshops: eight people with a laryngectomy, five family members and fifteen healthcare professionals. All participants agreed the highest priority need for developing a digital solution to community-based education and training. Preliminary programme theory, logic model and prototype education and training package were collaboratively designed. The education and training prototype includes ten agreed content topics (e.g. anatomy, communication), as well as design and implementation considerations.
conclusionThrough equal partnership working with key stakeholders, a prototype education and training package has been designed. The next stage is operationalisation, including co-production of content/supporting resources and building of the digital platform, and refinement. LIVED EXPERIENCE CONTRIBUTION: Lived experience was embedded throughout the study, shaping both its direction and delivery. Individuals with lived experience contributed as members of the research steering group, informing the overall study design and ensuring its relevance from the outset. A dedicated patient and public involvement group supported key stages of the project, including the development of the participant recruitment strategy, creation of resources for co-design, and planning of the co‑design workshops. Their insights also informed the analysis of findings and the refinement of the final prototype, ensuring that the intervention remained grounded in the realities, priorities, and expertise of those directly affected. People with a laryngectomy and their families also took part in co-designing the prototype.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.