ArticleGlobal health action2026
Frameworks to analyse accessibility of public recreational spaces for persons with disabilities: a rapid scoping review.
Article in Global health action, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The global population currently struggles to meet the physical activity guidelines. This is exacerbated for persons with disabilities (PWD). There is increasing acknowledgement of the need for recreational public spaces to be accessible and provide opportunities for physical activity. Designing and evaluating facilities requires tools and frameworks that capture diversity and consider access beyond the physical environment. Through a rapid scoping review, we sought to describe peer-reviewed literature that developed or implemented frameworks (conceptual or analytical) to analyse access for PWD in public recreational spaces. A comprehensive literature search on Web of Science was conducted. Studies were included if published in English between 2005 and 2025 and developed or implemented a framework to assess the inclusivity of public recreational spaces for PWD. Titles, abstracts, and full texts were independently screened by two reviewers. Reference lists of included papers were searched. Relevant papers were extracted. Of 872 identified papers, 42 underwent full-text review, and 20 (16 from the original search and 4 from reference lists) were included. All were based in middle- and high-income countries. Most used an established framework rather than developing their own. Frameworks were categorised as conceptual or analytical, with most being analytical. Inclusion of PWD in framework use or design was not consistently stated. All but one framework focused on the needs of people with physical disabilities. Ensuring access to public parks for persons with disabilities is an overlooked strategy to increasing recreational physical activity, particularly in low-income countries. Current frameworks need testing and adaptation for these contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.