ArticleJPRAS open2026
Free fillet upper extremity flap reconstruction after forequarter amputation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in JPRAS open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Forequarter amputation and related shoulder-girdle ablative procedures create extensive defects, often in previously irradiated fields. "Spare-parts" reconstruction using tissue from the amputated limb, most commonly the free fillet upper-extremity flap (FFUE), offers donor-site-sparing coverage. The reliability and complication profile of FFUE reconstruction remain uncertain because evidence is limited to small series and case reports. Methods: A PRISMA 2020-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted. PubMed, Scopus, and Embase were searched on 25 Nov 2025 using prespecified strategies, yielding 404 records; after deduplication and screening, 17 studies were included. We included studies reporting microvascular transfer of an upper-extremity fillet flap (forearm/arm/hand, with or without bone) to reconstruct defects created by forequarter amputation, interscapulothoracic amputation, or shoulder disarticulation. Primary outcomes were complete flap survival, any postoperative complication, and reoperation. Random-effects meta-analyses of proportions were performed using a generalized linear mixed model (GLMM) with logit link; τ and prediction intervals were reported. Sensitivity analyses used inverse-variance pooling with Hartung-Knapp adjustment. Results: Seventeen studies encompassing 44 patients met inclusion criteria. Most reconstructions followed forequarter amputation (86.4%) for malignant disease, frequently after prior radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy (75.0%). The pooled rate of complete flap survival was 97.0% (95% CI 88.8-99.3), with no reported total flap losses and one case of partial distal necrosis (2.3%). Any postoperative complication occurred in 31.2% (95% CI 18.7-47.3), and reoperation in 26.0% (95% CI 14.6-42.0). The most common complications were necrosis (16.1%), thrombosis (6.8%), and wound dehiscence (6.9%). Despite substantial heterogeneity and frequent prior multimodal therapy, free fillet upper-extremity flaps demonstrated consistently high reliability across reported series. Conclusions: FFUE reconstruction shows near-universal survival despite extreme defects and frequent prior multimodal oncologic therapy. Complications and reoperations are not rare but appear acceptable in context. Standardized reporting and multi-institutional collaboration are needed to define best practices and to evaluate patient-centered outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.