ArticleInternational journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease2026
User-Centered Design of an Electronic COPD Patient Questionnaire for Clinical Decision Support.
Article in International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Effective COPD management depends on structured symptom and risk assessment, individualized therapy, and action plan provision, yet these are inconsistently delivered in routine care. Electronic health record (EHR)-integrated clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) can help close these gaps but require accurate, structured patient data to drive their recommendations. Digital pre-visit questionnaires are increasingly used to collect such data, but patient preferences for their content and design remain poorly understood, particularly in COPD. Patients and Methods: We used a user-centered design process to develop an electronic COPD questionnaire to inform an EHR-integrated CDSS. Content was mapped to planned CDSS actions and built into a mobile-optimized prototype using eHealth design principles. We face validated the prototype with 10 people living with COPD, then refined it through successive focus groups until saturation. Usability was assessed with the System Usability Scale (SUS) and Likert ratings and transcripts were analyzed thematically. Results: Face validation (n=10) and three focus groups (n=13) were conducted to saturation. Four critical issues were identified and addressed. Usability was high throughout (mean SUS 88.07, "excellent"), with strong Likert ratings for functionality, navigation, and appearance. Thematic analysis yielded four themes: standardized measures versus real-life experience; usability and format as enablers; support for communication, memory, and efficient care; and desire for transparency and education. Conclusion: Through iterative co-design with older adults, we developed an EHR-integrated electronic COPD questionnaire with excellent usability and relevance to patients' lived experience. Patients anticipated benefits beyond data capture: improved symptom recall, visit preparation, and provider efficiency. This is one of the first electronic COPD questionnaires developed through structured patient co-design and qualitative evaluation, providing a transferable model for tools that inform clinical decision support.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.