Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42733837›Full record

ArticleiScience2026

An auditory "low road" for threat processing in humans sensitive to fast temporal cues.

Martina T Cinca-Tomás, Emmanouela Kosteletou-Kassotaki, Jordi Costa-Faidella, Carles Escera, Judith Domínguez-Borràs

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in iScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Martina T Cinca-TomásBrainlab-Cognitive Neuroscience Research Group, Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychobiology, University of Barcelona, 08035 Barcelona, Spain.
Emmanouela Kosteletou-KassotakiBrainlab-Cognitive Neuroscience Research Group, Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychobiology, University of Barcelona, 08035 Barcelona, Spain.
Jordi Costa-FaidellaBrainlab-Cognitive Neuroscience Research Group, Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychobiology, University of Barcelona, 08035 Barcelona, Spain.
Carles EsceraBrainlab-Cognitive Neuroscience Research Group, Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychobiology, University of Barcelona, 08035 Barcelona, Spain.
Judith Domínguez-BorràsBrainlab-Cognitive Neuroscience Research Group, Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychobiology, University of Barcelona, 08035 Barcelona, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rapid threat processing is a fundamental and evolutionarily conserved function of the brain. In vision, influential models of emotion propose the existence of a fast subcortical pathway for threat processing, connecting the visual thalamus with the amygdala, driven by coarse visual inputs. In audition, whether such a "shortcut" operates in humans has remained unknown. Here, using psychophysiology and neuroimaging, we provide convergent human evidence for an auditory pathway that is sensitive to fast temporal acoustic cues, previously linked to salient alarm signals and coarse auditory processing. Threatening sounds with fast temporal cues elicited rapid neural and autonomic responses at early post-stimulus latencies. Notably, right amygdala responses to these cues covaried with individual differences in strength of a direct auditory thalamo-amygdala pathway. Together, these findings identify a previously uncharacterized "low road" for auditory threat processing in humans, and establish fast temporal acoustic structure as a key feature supporting rapid affective responses.

Indexed as

amygdalaauditory threatfast temporal cuesfear conditioningsubcortical “low road”

Identifiers

PMID42733837
PMCPMC13571650

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.