Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42733833›Full record

ReviewClinical pharmacology : advances and applications2026

Cardiovascular and Metabolic Outcomes of Hormone Replacement Therapy in Women Aged 65 Years and Older: A Systematic Review of Randomized Clinical Trials.

Taraneh Mousavi, Md Fitrat Hossain, Fadia T Shaya, Wanda Hill, Stephen N Davis

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical pharmacology : advances and applications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Taraneh MousaviDepartment of Practice, Sciences, and Health Outcomes Research, School of Pharmacy, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1976-6789
Md Fitrat HossainDepartment of Practice, Sciences, and Health Outcomes Research, School of Pharmacy, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5674-5840
Fadia T ShayaDepartment of Practice, Sciences, and Health Outcomes Research, School of Pharmacy, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9424-8514
Wanda HillInstitute for Clinical and Translational Research, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, USA.ORCID 0009-0000-1408-715X
Stephen N DavisDepartment of Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8923-5209

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The cardiovascular, kidney, and metabolic effects of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) in postmenopausal women, particularly those who initiate treatment after age 65, remain incompletely characterized. The objective of this systematic review was to evaluate evidence on these outcomes, with a focus on women aged 65 years and older. Methods: PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library were searched for studies published between January 1, 2021, and February 28, 2026. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials and secondary or post-trial analyses evaluating HRT in postmenopausal women, particularly women aged 65 years and older. Outcomes included cardiovascular, renal, and metabolic endpoints. Risk of bias was assessed using RoB 2 where applicable, and evidence was synthesized narratively. The review protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD420261338310). Results: Of 1701 records identified, 6 reports met the inclusion criteria, all derived from three parent trials: the Women's Health Initiative Hormone Therapy Trials (WHI-HT), Early versus Late Intervention Trial with Estradiol (ELITE), and Kronos Early Estrogen Prevention Study (KEEPS). HRT effects varied by regimen and timing. In WHI-HT analyses, conjugated equine estrogens (CEE), alone or with medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA), lowered low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) but increased triglycerides and systolic blood pressure; CEE plus MPA had a less favorable coronary profile than CEE alone. ELITE supported less favorable vascular effects with later initiation, while KEEPS showed neutral long-term findings. No trial was designed specifically for women aged ≥65 years, and evidence in this age group was limited to subgroup analyses of broader postmenopausal women. Additionally, no studies included renal outcomes. Conclusion: Future prospective studies should evaluate cardiovascular, kidney, and metabolic outcomes across HRT regimens and timing in older postmenopausal women to guide individualized treatment decisions.

Indexed as

cardiovascular diseaseshormone replacement therapymenopausemetabolic diseasesrisk factorssystematic review

Identifiers

PMID42733833
PMCPMC13571631

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.