Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42733812›Full record

ArticlePatient preference and adherence2026

Medication Adherence and Relevance of the SPUR Behavioural Diagnostic Tool in the Management of Patients with Wilson's Disease: The WilSPUR Study.

Olivier Guillaud, Eduardo Couchonnal, Rodolphe Sobesky, Claire Vanlemmens, Jean-Baptiste Hiriart, Gersende Guédon, Kévin Dolgin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Patient preference and adherence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Olivier GuillaudWilson's Disease Reference Center, Woman Mother Child Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Bron, France.ORCID 0000-0002-3444-0798
Eduardo CouchonnalWilson's Disease Reference Center, Woman Mother Child Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Bron, France.ORCID 0000-0003-4595-9672
Rodolphe SobeskyDepartment of Hepatology,Paul Brousse Hospital, AP-HP, Villejuif, France.ORCID 0000-0002-0661-7728
Claire VanlemmensWilson's Disease and Other Rare Copper Disorders Competence Center, Jean Minjoz Hospital, CHU de Besançon, Besançon, France.ORCID 0000-0002-2048-3324
Jean-Baptiste HiriartHepatology and Liver Transplantation Unit, CHU de Bordeaux, Pessac, France.ORCID 0000-0002-8863-8230
Gersende GuédonObservia SAS, Puteaux, France.ORCID 0000-0002-9300-6131
Kévin DolginObservia SAS, Puteaux, France.ORCID 0000-0002-4818-8415

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Wilson's disease (WD) is a rare autosomal-recessive disorder of copper metabolism that can cause hepatic and/or neuropsychiatric manifestations, most often presents in young people. Lifelong treatment adherence is essential to prevent neurological deterioration, hepatic decompensation and death, yet non-adherence is frequent. Centres of the French national WD network evaluated the feasibility and the perceived utility of SPUR, a behavioural diagnostic tool, in the management of people living with WD. Methods: In this non-interventional, prospective, multicentre, non-comparative study, 100 adults with WD from four French centres completed the self-administered digital SPUR questionnaire, which estimates a non-adherence risk (NAR, 0-100) and identifies the individual behavioural drivers of that risk. Healthcare professionals (HCPs) then reported whether the SPUR results changed their perception of the patient, changed their support, and were useful overall. Results: The mean NAR was low (15.8/100). The predominant behavioural drivers were social (societal and immediate) and financial. Perceived health condition and perceived mental well-being were both inversely associated with the NAR. HCPs considered SPUR useful in 82% of cases, although the tool changed their perception of the patient in only 26.3% and their support in only 27.4% of cases. These findings are exploratory given the subjective clinician-reported endpoint and the selected cohort. Conclusion: Clinicians perceived SPUR as useful in a selected, hepatology-recruited WD cohort. Because the study had no comparator group, no objective adherence measure and no outcome follow-up, its effect on adherence behaviour and clinical outcomes remains to be established in prospective, controlled studies using objective adherence markers.

Indexed as

adherencebehavioural diagnostic toolSPURWilson’s disease

Identifiers

PMID42733812
PMCPMC13571612

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.