ArticlePatient preference and adherence2026
Medication Adherence and Relevance of the SPUR Behavioural Diagnostic Tool in the Management of Patients with Wilson's Disease: The WilSPUR Study.
Article in Patient preference and adherence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Wilson's disease (WD) is a rare autosomal-recessive disorder of copper metabolism that can cause hepatic and/or neuropsychiatric manifestations, most often presents in young people. Lifelong treatment adherence is essential to prevent neurological deterioration, hepatic decompensation and death, yet non-adherence is frequent. Centres of the French national WD network evaluated the feasibility and the perceived utility of SPUR, a behavioural diagnostic tool, in the management of people living with WD. Methods: In this non-interventional, prospective, multicentre, non-comparative study, 100 adults with WD from four French centres completed the self-administered digital SPUR questionnaire, which estimates a non-adherence risk (NAR, 0-100) and identifies the individual behavioural drivers of that risk. Healthcare professionals (HCPs) then reported whether the SPUR results changed their perception of the patient, changed their support, and were useful overall. Results: The mean NAR was low (15.8/100). The predominant behavioural drivers were social (societal and immediate) and financial. Perceived health condition and perceived mental well-being were both inversely associated with the NAR. HCPs considered SPUR useful in 82% of cases, although the tool changed their perception of the patient in only 26.3% and their support in only 27.4% of cases. These findings are exploratory given the subjective clinician-reported endpoint and the selected cohort. Conclusion: Clinicians perceived SPUR as useful in a selected, hepatology-recruited WD cohort. Because the study had no comparator group, no objective adherence measure and no outcome follow-up, its effect on adherence behaviour and clinical outcomes remains to be established in prospective, controlled studies using objective adherence markers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.