ArticleOpen access emergency medicine : OAEM2026
Emergency CT KUB: Incidental Findings and Their Clinical Significance.
Article in Open access emergency medicine : OAEM, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Incidental findings (IFs) on computed tomography of the kidneys, ureters, and bladder (CT KUB) are increasingly common in emergency departments (EDs) due to the widespread use of advanced imaging. These findings, often unrelated to the primary diagnostic indication, present clinical and operational challenges, particularly in high-volume, demographically diverse settings. Objective: To evaluate the prevalence, classification, and clinical significance of incidental findings on CT KUB scans performed in the ED for suspected obstructive uropathy, and to identify factors associated with clinically significant IFs and evaluate their clinical outcomes. Methods: A retrospective single-center observational study was conducted at a national tertiary-care hospital in Qatar, including all adult patients who underwent non-contrast CT KUB for suspected renal colic between January 1 and November 30, 2024. Demographic, clinical, and radiological data were extracted. IFs were categorized as major, moderate, or minor based on clinical relevance. Outcomes included prevalence and distribution of IFs, subsequent management actions, and factors associated with major IFs. Results: Of 2786 CT KUB scans analyzed, 1531 (54.9%) revealed at least one incidental finding. Most incidental findings were classified as minor (63.2%), whereas 6.1% were major and 30.8% were moderate according to the highest-severity incidental finding per scan. Major IFs (e.g, suspected malignancy, aortic aneurysm) accounted for most urgent interventions and admissions. Multivariable analysis identified that older age, nationality, fever, desaturation, and abdominal tenderness were independently associated with major IFs (all p<0.05). Management of the primary condition was delayed due to IFs in only 0.6% of cases. The most frequent IFs were vascular calcifications, bone lesions, and hernias. Conclusion: Incidental findings on CT KUB are common in the ED, with a significant proportion requiring further intervention or specialist referral. The high prevalence in a younger, multi-ethnic population underscores the need for context-specific protocols, structured reporting, and robust follow-up systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.