ArticleMethodsX2026
A reproducible U-net workflow for SEM/BSE bright-particle quantification.
Article in MethodsX, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Thermal exposure of metallic alloys can promote the precipitation of deleterious secondary particles that degrade mechanical and corrosion performance, making their quantitative characterisation from SEM/BSE micrographs an important step in microstructural assessment. Quantifying precipitate regions in SEM/BSE micrographs of thermally aged steels can be difficult when image contrast, particle size, and particle connectivity change across conditions. This method describes a reproducible workflow for generating reference bright-particle masks, training a lightweight U-Net segmentation model, and converting predicted masks into conventional microstructural descriptors. The workflow combines contrast-enhanced preprocessing, condition-aware reference mask generation, image-level data splitting, overlapping patch extraction, supervised U-Net training, fixed-threshold inference, and connected-component analysis. It is intended for SEM/BSE datasets where bright regions are used as image-based indicators of Cr/Mo-rich deleterious particles, while recognising that crystallographic phase identification requires complementary evidence. In the present application, the reported performance metrics quantify agreement with threshold-derived reference masks on held-out micrographs; they should not be interpreted as validation against independent phase-resolved ground truth. The demonstrated applicability and reported performance are limited to 2205 duplex stainless steel aged at 850 °C and imaged at 5000× using the acquisition protocol described here. Transfer to other materials or imaging domains requires separate validation and may require image recalibration, model fine-tuning, transfer learning, or complete retraining.•The workflow provides a reproducible route from raw SEM/BSE images to binary masks and particle-level descriptors.•Image-level splitting and fixed inference settings reduce data leakage and post-hoc condition tuning.•The method preserves compatibility with conventional area fraction, particle count, particle size, and morphology measurements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.