ArticleEClinicalMedicine2026
Long-acting HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis adherence and discontinuation: a global systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
40 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Long-acting HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) may overcome adherence and discontinuation challenges facing oral PrEP, which remain unsystematically reviewed. This study aimed to synthesize the evidence on long-acting PrEP adherence and discontinuation. Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies published from database inception to July 1, 2026 in PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library. Eligible studies reported adherence (on-time doses receipt at time points, e.g., at 2 months) or discontinuation (stopping doses or loss to follow-up within a time period, e.g., within 6 months) of long-acting PrEP, including long-acting injectable (LAI) and intravaginal ring (IVR) PrEP. Non-longitudinal designs and non-English publications were excluded. We used random-effects meta-analyses to pool estimates. Subgroup analyses were conducted by population, region, and study design. Findings: We identified 46 eligible studies (28 LAI and 18 IVR) including 22,945 individuals (14,190 and 8755). Adherence to six-monthly and two-monthly LAI-PrEP at 12 months was 93.0% (95% CI: 91.6-94.3) and 88.1% (84.7-90.8%); discontinuation for the six-monthly and two-monthly regimens within 12 months was 8.2% (4.9-13.4) and 16.0% (10.8-23.1). Discontinuation for two-monthly LAI-PrEP was higher in implementation studies than in clinical trials (14.6% vs. 1.8% within 6 months; 32.0% vs. 10.3% within 12 months, Interpretation: Adherence to LAI-PrEP remained high through 12 months, with the best adherence being observed in clinical trials, which serve as upper-bound benchmarks. Compared to LAI-PrEP, IVR-PrEP had lower adherence and higher discontinuation. Efforts facilitating longer-term adherence warrant research. Funding: This study was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.