Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42733759›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet regional health. Southeast Asia2026

Pre-exposure prophylaxis as a complementary vaccination strategy to reduce rabies in Kerala, India: a cost-effectiveness modelling study.

Martha M Luka, Zinia Thajudeen Nujum, Miqdad Asaria, Elaine A Ferguson, Sivanandan Harikumar, Daniel T Haydon, Rony Ray John, Katie Hampson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet regional health. Southeast Asia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Martha M LukaSchool of Biodiversity, One Health & Veterinary Medicine, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 8QQ, Scotland, UK.
Zinia Thajudeen NujumDepartment of Community Medicine, Government Medical College, Kollam, Kerala, India.
Miqdad AsariaDepartment of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK.
Elaine A FergusonSchool of Biodiversity, One Health & Veterinary Medicine, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 8QQ, Scotland, UK.
Sivanandan HarikumarDirectorate of Health Services, Kerala, India.
Daniel T HaydonSchool of Biodiversity, One Health & Veterinary Medicine, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 8QQ, Scotland, UK.
Rony Ray JohnDirectorate of Animal Husbandry, Kerala, India.
Katie HampsonSchool of Biodiversity, One Health & Veterinary Medicine, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 8QQ, Scotland, UK.

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) and dog vaccination continue to be the widely adopted vaccination strategy for rabies control in high-burden countries like India. To determine the public health and economic impacts of childhood pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) relative to existing strategies, we carried out a modelling analysis in the state of Kerala, India. Methods: We adapted a probabilistic decision-tree model over a 10-year time horizon (2026-2035). This timeframe is sufficient for dog vaccination to interrupt rabies transmission and for protection to accrue from PrEP delivered through routine childhood immunisation. The model simulates interactions between dog vaccination, PrEP, and PEP to estimate health provider costs, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained, and net health benefit across a range of willingness-to-pay thresholds. Findings: Assuming current practice of four-dose intradermal PEP and sub-optimal dog vaccination, we projected 431 rabies deaths (95% Prediction interval [PI] 353-523) and a cost of US$50.3 million over ten years, with dog vaccination responsible for almost 70% of deaths averted by this strategy. Routine childhood PrEP increased costs by US$10.5-36.5 million (INR 1.0-3.4 billion), depending on the regimen used, and cumulatively prevented only ten additional deaths beyond those averted by current practice. Incorporating PrEP was not optimal (probability ≤12%) across India's willingness-to-pay threshold. The intensified owned-dog vaccination strategy achieved the highest benefit at India's mean willingness-to-pay (739,420 QALYs; 28% probability of optimality), while adopting WHO's recommended abridged PEP regimen was the only cost-saving strategy (US$6.3 million saved; equivalent mortality to status quo). Comprehensive dog vaccination coverage of 70% combined with abridged PEP regimens became optimal at India's upper willingness-to-pay threshold, reducing deaths by 83% compared to current practice. Interpretation: In high-PEP-access settings, PrEP is not cost-effective and provides negligible benefit. To maximise lives saved, PrEP should only be considered once gains from strengthening dog vaccination and PEP delivery have been exhausted. Funding: Wellcome Trust; Indian Council of Medical Research - Department of Health Research (ICMR-DHR) International Fellowship for Senior Biomedical Scientists.

Indexed as

Decision treeEliminationLyssavirusNeglected tropical diseasesOne health

Identifiers

PMID42733759
PMCPMC13571938

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.