ReviewCureus2026
Major Adverse Events Associated With Emergency Endotracheal Intubation in Adult Patients: A Systematic Review.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Emergency endotracheal intubation (ETI) is among the highest-risk procedures performed in acutely ill adults, yet the burden, spectrum, and determinants of major peri-intubation adverse events remain unevenly characterised across settings. This systematic review synthesises contemporary primary evidence on major adverse events complicating emergency ETI in adults. PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched from January 2021 to July 2026 for peer-reviewed primary studies (randomised trials, prospective or retrospective cohorts, and case-control studies) reporting major adverse events after non-elective ETI in adults outside the operating theatre. Reviews, meta-analyses, protocols, abstracts, editorials, letters, and preprints were excluded. Data were extracted in duplicate; observational studies were appraised with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and randomised trials with the Cochrane RoB 2 tool. Findings were synthesised narratively in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020. Fourteen studies comprising approximately 61,430 intubation encounters across 14 countries were included. At least one major adverse event was reported in 14-52% of emergency intubations, with composite event rates of 45.2% in a 29-country cohort and 32.3% in a national emergency department cohort. Cardiovascular instability was consistently the dominant event (20.0-43.4%), followed by severe hypoxaemia (9.3-18.5%) and peri-intubation cardiac arrest (1.0-5.4%). Risk rose steeply with each additional laryngoscopy attempt (adjusted odds ratio: 4.4 for two attempts and 13.9 for four) and with pre-intubation hypotension, hypoxaemia, acidaemia, and elevated lactate. Major adverse events were independently associated with mortality. Major adverse events complicate a substantial minority to majority of emergency intubations in adults and are driven principally by pre-existing physiological derangement and repeated attempts. Standardised outcome definitions and pre-intubation haemodynamic optimisation warrant priority attention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.