ReviewCureus2026
Desquamative Gingivitis: A Narrative Review of Practical Diagnostic Approach for General Dental Practitioners.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Desquamative gingivitis (DG) is a clinical sign characterized by gingival erythema, epithelial desquamation, and erosion rather than a discrete diagnosis. It most commonly reflects underlying oral lichen planus, mucous membrane pemphigoid, or pemphigus vulgaris. As affected patients typically present to general dental practitioners, timely recognition and structured triage are essential for effective management. However, diagnostic delays remain common and can extend the management period by several months. This narrative review synthesizes the current evidence on the clinical presentation, epidemiology, etiology, differential diagnosis, diagnostic workup, and management pathways relevant to general dentistry for this condition. Key findings indicate that a staged clinical history and examination can substantially narrow the differential diagnosis prior to biopsy, that histopathology combined with direct immunofluorescence offers superior diagnostic yield compared with histopathology alone, and that biopsy technique and site selection, favoring perilesional or uninvolved tissue and atraumatic sampling methods, meaningfully affect the diagnostic accuracy. Chronic ulcerative stomatitis and lichen planus pemphigoides are important but frequently overlooked mimics of more common causes. While disease-specific pharmacotherapy generally requires specialist oversight, professional oral hygiene reinforcement and gentle periodontal care delivered by general dental practitioners produce consistent, evidence-supported improvements in pain and lesion activity across all underlying diagnoses. A structured, practical approach to recognition, biopsy planning, and prompt referral can shorten the diagnostic pathway and improve long-term outcomes in patients with this challenging clinical condition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.