ArticleJPRAS open2026
Is thumb carpometacarpal instability assessed in young patients with thumb base symptoms? A multicenter study.
Article in JPRAS open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Thumb Carpometacarpal Instability: An International Survey on Terminology, Diagnostic Workup, and Treatment.Hand (New York, N.Y.) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Thumb base complaints in younger patients are diagnostically challenging, and symptoms are commonly attributed to either carpometacarpal (CMC) osteoarthritis or ligamentous instability. These conditions require fundamentally different treatment strategies, making accurate diagnosis essential. The reported frequency of CMC instability varies considerably across clinical practices, possibly reflecting differences in diagnostic awareness rather than true differences in prevalence. This study therefore aimed to describe the diagnostic workup of younger patients with nontraumatic thumb base complaints, with a focus on the use and findings of instability testing. In this retrospective multicenter study of 85 patients younger than 45 years, instability testing was performed in only 39%, yet was positive in 75% when assessed. Patient characteristics were similar between tested and untested patients, suggesting that testing reflected variation in diagnostic practice rather than clinical suspicion. Positive instability tests were also observed in patients labeled as osteoarthritis, often without radiographic signs of degeneration. These findings suggest that CMC instability may be underrecognized in younger patients, and that variation in diagnostic practice likely contributes to its inconsistent recognition. Failure to recognize instability may lead to osteoarthritis-directed surgery in patients who could have been treated with joint-preserving approaches. Systematic assessment of CMC instability is therefore essential to ensure accurate diagnosis and guide optimal treatment in this population. Level of evidence: Level IV.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.