ArticleInternational journal of clinical and health psychology : IJCHP
The future seen: Does episodic future thinking influence health decision-making in adolescents?
Article in International journal of clinical and health psychology : IJCHP. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although prior research has clearly demonstrated the general impact of episodic future thinking (EFT) on behavioral decision-making, there has been a scarcity of studies investigating how different features of EFT might variably affect health-related intertemporal choices in adolescents. This lack of research hinders our comprehension of the functional specificity of EFT. The present research aimed to examine how three specific characteristics of EFT (i.e., temporal distance, health relevance, and simulation perspective) influence health-related intertemporal decision-making in adolescent populations. Three experiments were designed and conducted with 248 adolescents aged 15 to 17 years. The decision-making was measured by health-related intertemporal decision-making task. Study 1 experimentally manipulated temporal distance through an episodic thinking imagination task, comparing intertemporal choice between a near-term EFT condition and a long-term EFT condition. Study 2 manipulated the content of EFT (specifically for long-term EFT), comparing intertemporal choice between a health-relevant EFT condition and a health-irrelevant EFT condition. Study 3 manipulated the perspective adopted during EFT simulation (specifically for long-term EFT within health-relevant content), comparing intertemporal choice between a first-person perspective EFT condition and a third-person perspective EFT condition. Study 1 found that long-term EFT was more conducive to health decisions than near-term EFT. Study 2 found that health-relevant EFT was more effective than health-irrelevant EFT. Study 3 found that third-person perspective simulation promoted better health decisions compared to first-person perspective simulation. These findings highlight the functional specificity of EFT and suggest that its impact on intertemporal decision-making can be optimized by manipulating temporal distance, content relevance, and simulation perspective.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.