Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42733646›Full record

ArticleJournal of hand surgery global online2027

A Biomechanical Analysis of Intramedullary Threaded Nail Fixation and Dorsal Plate and Screw Fixation for Metacarpal Base Fractures.

Stephen M Himmelberg, Alexander D Jeffs, Andrew D Allen, Nicholas C Bank, Ankur Khanna, Margaret E Easson, Matthew B Fischer, Gregory M Knoll, Reid W Draeger, J Megan M Patterson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of hand surgery global online, 2027. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Stephen M HimmelbergDepartment of Orthopaedics, The University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC.
Alexander D JeffsDepartment of Orthopaedics, The University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC.
Andrew D AllenDepartment of Orthopaedics, The University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC.
Nicholas C BankDepartment of Orthopaedics, The University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC.
Ankur KhannaDepartment of Orthopaedics, The University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC.
Margaret E EassonLampe Joint Department of Biomedical Engineering, North Carolina State University and University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Raleigh, NC.
Matthew B FischerLampe Joint Department of Biomedical Engineering, North Carolina State University and University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Raleigh, NC.
Gregory M KnollLampe Joint Department of Biomedical Engineering, North Carolina State University and University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Raleigh, NC.
Reid W DraegerDepartment of Orthopaedics, The University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC.
J Megan M PattersonDepartment of Orthopaedics, The University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: The biomechanics of surgically treated metacarpal base fractures are poorly described. We hypothesized that intramedullary threaded nail (IMTN) fixation and dorsal plate and screw (DPS) fixation would perform similarly in multiple fracture locations approaching the metacarpal base. Methods: Sixty-four metacarpals from eight matched pair cadaveric hands were stripped. Matched pairs were randomly divided into four cohorts based on fracture distance from the metacarpal base. Transverse osteotomies were created at 50%, 35%, 25%, and 15% of the total metacarpal length, measured from the metacarpal base. The 50% cohort served as a control. For each cohort, paired metacarpals were randomized to either DPS or IMTN fixation groups. All specimens were cyclically loaded in 3-point bending for 2,000 cycles at 70 N, 2,000 cycles at 120 N, and then loaded to failure. Bending stiffness, cycles to failure, and peak load to failure (LTF) were collected. Results: Peak bending stiffness and peak LTF were not significantly different in the 15%, 25%, or 35% groups compared to the 50% control for both IMTN and DPS fixation. Direct comparison of IMTN and DPS fixation at each osteotomy level yielded no significant differences in LTF or bending stiffness. There was a nonsignificant trend toward higher LTF and bending stiffness with DPS fixation in more proximal fractures. Conclusions: Peak LTF and bending stiffness were not significantly different for IMTN or DPS fixation in fractures located as proximally as 15% from the metacarpal base. Furthermore, both IMTN and DPS fixation had no significant differences in peak bending stiffness and LTF for metacarpal fractures as proximal as 15% from the base compared to a 50% control. Clinical relevance: When managing proximal metacarpal fractures surgeons can expect no significant difference in stiffness or LTF using either DPS or IMTN fixation with values comparable to those seen when treating a midshaft metacarpal fracture.

Indexed as

Metacarpal base fractureMetacarpal dorsal platingProximal metacarpal fractureRetrograde intramedullary metacarpal fixation

Identifiers

PMID42733646
PMCPMC13571300

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.