ReviewBlood and lymphatic cancer : targets and therapy2026
A Literature Review of Immunotherapeutics in the Management of Adult B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia.
Review in Blood and lymphatic cancer : targets and therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Relapsed/refractory (R/R) B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) has historically been associated with poor outcomes in adults treated with conventional chemotherapy. Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) in second remission has been the only strategy associated with durable remissions and potential cure. However, achieving remission after first relapse was challenging in the era predating immunotherapy, and remissions were often brief, frequently limiting the ability to proceed to HCT. Consequently, for decades there has been a critical need for more effective therapeutic approaches in R/R B-ALL. Fortunately, in the last decade, B-ALL has undergone a remarkable therapeutic transformation with the introduction of novel targeted immunotherapies. Blinatumomab, inotuzumab ozogamicin, and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy have substantially improved patient outcomes in the R/R disease settings while reducing reliance on intensive cytotoxic chemotherapy, and their use has increasingly expanded into the frontline setting as well. This literature review summarizes the pivotal clinical trials supporting the use of blinatumomab, inotuzumab ozogamicin, and CAR T-cell therapies in B-ALL, with a particular focus on their efficacy and toxicity profiles. We also provide our perspective on how these agents can be incorporated into clinical practice and highlight emerging therapeutic agents and strategies. In conclusion, continued advancement and earlier integration of immunotherapeutic approaches could improve long-term outcomes in patients with B-ALL.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.