ArticleJournal of hand surgery global online2027
Very Early Outcomes in Endoscopic Versus Open Carpal Tunnel Release.
Article in Journal of hand surgery global online, 2027. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Although many studies have focused on long-term postoperative outcomes for endoscopic carpal tunnel release (ECTR) and open carpal tunnel release (OCTR), few have focused on results in the very early postoperative period of days 3-14. This period is particularly important in some cases as a patient's ability to function well with little pain early after surgery can be critical in regaining function, meeting family responsibilities, and returning to work. We hypothesized that ECTR patients would have improved function and less pain within the very early time postoperative period and return to work earlier compared to OCTR patients. Methods: A prospective, multicenter study was performed over 2 years. Three fellowship-trained hand surgeons participated. Postoperative care and activity instructions were standardized for all three participating surgeons for both OCTR and ECTR. Results: Patients undergoing carpal tunnel release via both OCTR and ECTR experienced progressive improvement in pain and function with the surgically treated hand, with significantly better outcomes seen in the endoscopic cohort. Decreased pain based on the Numeric Rating Scale and the Patient-Rated Wrist and Hand Evaluation Pain scale were found at postoperative day (POD) 3, 7, and 14 for the ECTR group compared to the OCTR group. Higher Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation and better Patient-Rated Wrist and Hand Evaluation function scores indicating earlier return of function were seen after endoscopic release. Finally, there was a significant difference ( Conclusions: ECTR is associated with benefits in pain and function in the very early postoperative period favoring endoscopic intervention at PODs 3, 7, and 14, with earlier rates of return to work on PODs 3 and 7 in favor of the endoscopic group. Type of study/level of evidence: Therapeutic IIc.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.