ArticleJSES international2026
Prediction of humeral torsion from proximal humerus computed tomography is enabled by three-dimensional estimation of the transepicondylar axis using deep learning.
Article in JSES international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Humeral torsion is an important factor for reverse total shoulder arthroplasty planning, yet its measurement requires elbow imaging frequently absent from clinical computed tomography (CT) scans. We hypothesized that a deep learning approach could accurately predict humeral torsion from proximal humerus morphology alone. Methods: CT-based segmentations from 581 shoulders were used to train and evaluate a deep learning model within the nnU-Net framework. The transepicondylar axis was represented as a full 3-dimensional plane extending throughout the imaging volume. The model was trained on 478 cases and tested on 103, with ground-truth torsion derived from elbow segmentations. Robustness to osteophytes and reduced fields of view was assessed. Results: The model achieved a mean absolute torsion prediction error of 5.35° ± 3.96° and a strong linear correlation with ground-truth measurements (R = 0.85), outperforming prior proximal landmark-based approaches (R = 0.33-0.42). Performance was robust to osteophytes (mean error: 6.19° ± 3.95°) and was maintained with proximal field of view reductions down to 25% of humeral length, beyond which accuracy progressively declined. Conclusion: Deep learning can predict humeral torsion directly from proximal humerus morphology with clinically relevant accuracy, reducing the need for distal elbow imaging. These findings support the hypothesis that torsional alignment is largely encoded in the proximal epiphysis and offers a practical solution for reverse total shoulder arthroplasty planning when full-length CT is unavailable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.