ReviewBrain & spine2026
Association of cerebral microdialysis monitoring with clinical outcomes after traumatic brain injury; A systematic review.
Review in Brain & spine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Cerebral microdialysis (CMD) enables bedside monitoring of cerebral metabolism after traumatic brain injury (TBI). This systematic review evaluates associations between CMD-derived analytes and mortality and functional outcome in adults with moderate-to-severe TBI. Methods: A systematic review was conducted of adult patients with moderate-to-severe TBI (Glasgow Coma Scale ≤12) undergoing CMD monitoring of glucose, lactate, pyruvate, lactate/pyruvate ratio (LPR), glutamate, and/or glycerol. Prespecified outcomes were mortality and functional outcome (Glasgow Outcome Scale, Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended or modified Rankin Scale). Due to substantial between-study heterogeneity, findings were synthesized qualitatively. Results: The database search identified 1342 records; 33 studies met inclusion criteria. CMD-glucose and CMD-lactate were the most commonly measure analytes (26 studies each), and the least was CMD-glycerol (12 studies). 9 studies have analyzed as a combined biochemical pattern or multimodal modality in relation to outcome. Higher CMD-glucose levels were mostly associated with better outcomes, whereas lower CMD-glucose and elevated CMD- LPR, CMD-glutamate and CMD-glycerol levels were associated with mortality or unfavorable functional outcome. However, analyte thresholds, probe locations, monitoring windows and outcome definitions varied widely and adjusted prognostic estimates were rarely reported. Certainty of evidence was predominantly low to very low. Conclusion: CMD biomarkers show directional associations with outcome after moderate-to-severe TBI, but the evidence is heterogeneous and of low certainty, insufficient to support routine use of CMD analytes for prognostic stratification. Standardization of analyte thresholds, probe location, monitoring windows is needed before their prognostic value can be established.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.