ArticleInterventional pain medicine2026
Outcomes after cervical transforaminal epidural steroid injections vs cervical interlaminar epidural steroid injections: A propensity matched comparison study utilizing a large national database.
Article in Interventional pain medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cervical transforaminal and interlaminar epidural steroid injections (CTFESI and CILESI) are commonly used to treat cervical radicular symptoms. There is limited literature comparing the two procedures with some concerns of increased risk of complications after CTFESI. Objective: Compare the rates of cervical spine surgery, post-procedure opioid use, and complications after CTFESI and CILESI. Methods: Retrospective propensity matched cohort comparison utilizing a large global database was performed of adult patients with diagnostic codes for cervical radiculopathy undergoing CTFESI or CILESI. Each cohort was matched for age, sex, race/ethnicity, BMI and obesity codes, nicotine use, mental health diagnoses, chronic cardiovascular, pulmonary and renal diseases, pre-procedural opioid use, and prior spine surgery. The primary outcome was the rate of eventual anterior cervical decompression and fusion, total disc replacement, and/or neuroforaminotomy. Secondary outcomes included post-procedure opioid use and major (stroke, myocardial infarction, paralysis, and seizure) and minor (headache, pallor, syncope, flushing) complications. Results: The rate of cervical spine surgery was higher for CTFESI compared to CILESI. Post-procedure opioid use was also higher for the CTFESI. Compared to CILESI, CTFESI was associated with greater risk of stroke, seizures, myocardial infarction and minor complications. There was no difference in risk of paralysis. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that patients undergoing CILESI were less likely to use opioid medications post-procedurally, have less major and minor complications and lower likelihood of having surgery as compared to CTFESI. These differences may be due to sampling biases between the two groups that were part of the clinical decision process in selecting the approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.