ArticleAmerican heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice2026
Mechanical circulatory support for haemodynamic protection in patients with heart failure during non-cardiac surgery.
Article in American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The prevalence of heart failure and the rate of surgical interventions are increasing worldwide, leading to a rising number of patients with heart failure who are at high perioperative risk. We analyzed the value of mechanical circulatory support (MCS) in patients with severe cardiac impairment who underwent non-cardiac surgery. Methods: Single center retrospective analysis of 5 patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery (NCS) protected by MCS. Results: Four patients with cardiogenic shock underwent NCS (gland resection, n = 4) protected by veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and an Impella CP microaxial pump. Elective Surgical thyroidectomy under hemodynamic protection with Impella CP was performed in one patient with severe chronic heart failure.All patients initially survived the surgery, and mechanical circulatory support led to rapid lactate clearance. One patient died during follow-up due to advanced multiorgan failure, the remaining four patients could be successfully weaned from hemodynamic circulatory support. Notably, the patient with fatal outcomes had the longest delay between the onset of cardiogenic shock and initiation of MCS, while other patients with elective or rapid (<24 h) implantation of mechanical circulatory support had favorable outcomes. Conclusions: MCS is a promising strategy in cardiogenic shock, enabling hemodynamic stabilization and protected surgery. Rapid initiation of MCS is important. This approach may be viable for selected patients with severe heart failure who require elective NCS. Findings are preliminary and hypothesis-generating, further validation is needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.