ArticleEJVES vascular forum2026
Pedicle Screw-Aortic Interaction: A Single Centre Experience and Proposal for a Morphology Based Management Algorithm.
Article in EJVES vascular forum, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Pedicle screw (PS) fixation is widely used in thoracolumbar spine surgery. Although major vascular injury is uncommon, PS-aortic interactions may lead to severe complications, and optimal management remains poorly defined. This study proposes a morphology based algorithm to guide multidisciplinary management of PS-aortic interactions and reports a single centre experience. Methods: All consecutive patients referred to a vascular surgery unit between 2020 and 2025 for PS interaction with the descending thoracic aorta were reviewed retrospectively. Pre-operative assessment was performed using contrast enhanced computed tomography angiography (CTA). Screw-aorta interactions were classified as near contact (NC), aortic contact (AC), aortic indentation (AI), or aortic penetration (AP). Management followed a multidisciplinary morphology based algorithm: NC and AC were managed with screw removal under serial intra-operative angiographic control, whereas AI and AP underwent prophylactic thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). Results: Eight patients (median age 25 years [interquartile range 18, 38]) were included. Indications for spinal fixation were scoliosis ( Conclusion: A morphology based algorithm prioritising aortic wall deformation rather than proximity alone may provide a feasible and potentially safe strategy for managing PS-aortic interactions, supporting standardised multidisciplinary decision making in this rare but high risk condition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.