ArticleCureus2026
HydroMark Clip-Guided Cryoablation of a <3-mm Breast Cancer at the Lower Limit of Sonographic Conspicuity in a High-Risk Surgical Patient.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Breast cryoablation is emerging as a minimally invasive local treatment for carefully selected patients with low-risk, early-stage breast cancer. We report the case of a 73-year-old woman with a 3-mm, Nottingham grade 1, estrogen receptor-positive, progesterone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative invasive ductal carcinoma (cT1a cN0, stage IA) who was considered a poor surgical candidate because of severe pulmonary disease, chronic liver disease, active tobacco and alcohol use, peripheral arterial disease, and ongoing antiplatelet therapy. Following ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy, the tumor became poorly conspicuous, while the sonographically visible HydroMark clip (Devicor Medical Products, Inc., Cincinnati, OH) remained centered within the biopsy site. The clip was therefore used as the primary landmark for probe positioning during percutaneous ultrasound-guided cryoablation. Real-time ultrasonography confirmed complete ice-ball coverage of the clip-centered target, and hydrodissection maintained a protective plane between the ablation zone and the skin. The procedure was completed without complication. At the two-month follow-up, contrast-enhanced breast MRI and targeted ultrasound demonstrated expected post-ablation changes without suspicious residual enhancement or a residual mass. This case demonstrates that a HydroMark clip can serve as a reliable sonographic landmark for target localization and probe positioning when a small tumor becomes poorly conspicuous after biopsy. Although early imaging findings were favorable, longer-term follow-up is needed to confirm durable local tumor control.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.