ArticleKidney international reports2026
Combining Cystatin C and Creatinine Increases eGFR Slope Accuracy in ADPKD.
Article in Kidney international reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: In autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) trials, creatinine-based estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR, eGFR Methods: In the 260 patients with ADPKD from the DIPAK observational cohort, we compared 2021 Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD)-Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI)-based eGFR based on the following: (i) routine clinical creatinine, (ii) batch-measured creatinine, and (iii) batch-measured cystatin C to mGFR. Creatinine and cystatin batch measurements were performed on the same day to minimize variability. Cross-sectional performance was evaluated by bias (eGFR - mGFR), precision, accuracy (P30/P10), and CKD stage agreement. Longitudinal agreement between mGFR and eGFR slopes (ml/min per 1.73 m Results: Cross-sectional performance of batch-measured eGFR Conclusion: The use of eGFR
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.