ReviewCureus2026
Comprehensive Advances in General Medicine and Trauma Emergency Care: Integrating Surgery, Internal Medicine, and Lifestyle Medicine for Holistic Patient Management.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Emergency and trauma care increasingly involves patients with overlapping acute pathology, chronic disease, frailty, infection risk, functional limitation, and modifiable cardiometabolic factors. Although research published between 2020 and 2026 shows important advances in resuscitation, surgery, critical care, rehabilitation, and chronic disease prevention, these domains are often evaluated separately, limiting their translation into coordinated patient-centred care. This narrative review aimed to synthesise recent evidence from 2020 to 2026 on general medicine and trauma emergency care through an integrated framework combining surgery, internal medicine, rehabilitation, and lifestyle medicine. Studies were reviewed across trauma triage, prehospital and emergency resuscitation, operative and non-operative surgical decision-making, perioperative medical optimisation, sepsis management, organ support, analgesia, rehabilitation, lifestyle intervention, and digital follow-up. The evidence suggests that outcomes depend on accurate triage, timely stabilisation, appropriate use of resuscitative adjuncts, individualised surgical decisions, frailty assessment, comorbidity control, antimicrobial stewardship, physiologically guided critical care, multimodal analgesia, graded rehabilitation, and secondary prevention targeting nutrition, physical activity, glycaemic control, and cardiovascular risk. The literature also highlights uncertainties, including variable benefit from prehospital tranexamic acid and blood products, mixed findings on fluid restriction and sedation strategies, implementation barriers, and the need for longer-term functional outcome measures. Integrating emergency medicine, surgery, internal medicine, critical care, geriatrics, rehabilitation, digital health, and lifestyle medicine may improve survival, reduce complications, preserve function, and strengthen continuity of care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.