ArticleAdvances in radiation oncology2026
Effect of Anatomic Contextual Information on the Performance of a Convolutional Neural Network Tasked With Brain Metastasis Detection.
Article in Advances in radiation oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Modern management of brain metastases requires close surveillance with serial magnetic resonance imaging, creating interest in techniques for automated detection. The convolutional neural network (CNN) is currently the dominant approach to automated metastasis detection, and multiple variations of the CNN have been investigated to improve performance. In this work, we looked beyond the impact of network architecture and assessed the impact on performance of providing anatomic contextual information to a CNN during the training period. Methods and Materials: The nnU-Net, a widely adopted CNN, was selected for this study. The nnU-Net was trained on an institutional data set comprising 301 high-resolution, T1-weighted, contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance images and associated structure labels consisting of both target brain metastases (1111 total) and several organs at risk (OARs) that were labeled in the process of radiosurgery planning. During the training period, the model was presented with either labeled brain metastases (BM) alone or with the complete structure set of metastases and OARs (BM+OAR). The test set contained 100 cases and 421 total metastases. Results: We found that, by multiple standard performance metrics, the BM+OAR model outperformed the BM model. Median case-wise Dice coefficient for BM was 0.75 (IQR, 0.51-0.86) and for BM+OAR was 0.79 (IQR, 0.58-0.86) ( Conclusions: These findings suggest that providing anatomic contextual information can improve the accuracy of CNN-based automated brain metastasis detection algorithms and open new opportunities for research into the optimization of automated detection approaches for brain metastases.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.