ArticleNeurotrauma reports
Voluntary Leg Movement Enabled after Complete Paralysis Using Noninvasive Spinal Cord Transcutaneous Stimulation, a Case Study.
Article in Neurotrauma reports. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Neuromodulation for the recovery of lower extremity motor function has shown much progress for those living with severe paralysis after spinal cord injury (SCI). Transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (scTS) has emerged as a noninvasive alternative to epidural stimulation for improving motor function after SCI. However, it is unknown whether a single scTS session can acutely reveal voluntary motor output and enable modulation of movement characteristics without prior stimulation exposure or task-specific training in individuals with clinically motor-complete SCI. The individual was male, 35 years old and injured 13 years prior to enrollment in the study and had no voluntary motor movement below the T8 injury level, rendering the pelvis and legs completely paralyzed. Noninvasive transcutaneous stimulation (30 Hz, 1 ms) was delivered at T11/12 and L1/L2 vertebral levels sequentially with continuous biphasic pulses below motor threshold. The individual was able to volitionally control right knee extension in a seated position with intent, on command, and against resistance and control the rate of movement using the scTS parameters focused on the lumbosacral spinal cord repeatedly within a session without activity-based training. This was reproducible one week and one month later without intervening training. These findings suggest that noninvasive scTS can acutely alter the physiological state of the spinal cord, revealing clinically silent but functionally accessible neural pathways even years after injury and expanding the potential relevance of neuromodulation for individuals with very chronic SCI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.