Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42733420›Full record

ReviewPediatric investigation2026

Artificial intelligence interaction is not equivalent to social interaction: Rethinking artificial intelligence-mediated digital exposure in early childhood.

Ayhan Çeri, Hüseyin Yılmaz

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pediatric investigation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ayhan ÇeriDepartment of Pediatrics Dr. Ali Kemal Belviranlı Maternity and Children's Hospital Selçuklu Konya Turkey.
Hüseyin YılmazPediatric Cardiology Unit Konya City Training and Research Hospital Karatay Konya Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The increasing integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into children's daily environments challenges traditional approaches to evaluating digital exposure. Although existing research has primarily focused on screen time, AI-based interactions introduce qualitatively different dynamics that remain insufficiently conceptualized. This narrative review aims to synthesize current evidence on digital media use and emerging evidence on AI-based interaction to propose a novel framework distinguishing AI engagement from traditional screen exposure. Findings indicate that traditional screen exposure is associated with adverse outcomes in language development, attention regulation, and social interaction, although these associations are not uniform and are moderated by content and parental involvement. In contrast, AI-based systems provide adaptive and personalized interactions that may enhance cognitive engagement, including learning and problem-solving. However, these systems lack genuine emotional reciprocity and may create an illusion of social interaction. Based on these findings, a spectrum model of digital exposure is proposed, illustrating a trade-off between increasing cognitive stimulation and decreasing opportunities for authentic social development across passive, interactive, and AI-based media. These findings highlight the need to move beyond time-based metrics toward frameworks that consider interaction quality, and updated clinical and policy approaches are required to address the developmental implications of AI-integrated childhood environments.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceChildrenCognitive developmentDigital mediaInteractionPediatricSocio‐emotional

Identifiers

PMID42733420
PMCPMC13570809

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.