Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42733387›Full record

ArticleAnnals of neurosciences2026

Exploring Psychopathology with Brain Fingerprinting Technique.

Anand Pratap Singh, Aakriti Varshney

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of neurosciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Anand Pratap SinghDepartment of Psychology and Mental Health, Gautam Buddha University, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1079-2681
Aakriti VarshneyDepartment of Psychology and Mental Health, Gautam Buddha University, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5416-0446

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the exploration of psychopathology, the most discussed anecdote which always remained contradictory was the notion of 'functional vs biological' perspective of psychopathology. With the same anecdote, the present study attempted to reflect the clarity on the issue by taking a paradigmatic move in exploring the psychopathology with the help of Brain Fingerprinting Technique (BFT). BFT computes a mathematical and statistical algorithm for determination of information through presentation of stimuli. This presentation of stimuli leads to generation of P300-MERMER brainwave to determine the information. The same argument of real vs virtual experiential contexts pertaining to certain psychiatric conditions was applied in the present study. With the help of data analysis, it was proven that no biological evidence of fingerprinting with respect to delusional beliefs, perception of auditory stimuli in hallucinatory behaviour and real loss of information in case of dissociative amnesia was observed in the brain. Rather, in first two conditions the mathematical and statistical algorithm computed 'information absent' and in third condition it computed as 'information present' respectively. The above observations helped in substantiating the diagnoses of the patients with scientific sanctity and physiological correlates. The present study could be able to expand the horizon of applications of BFT in few of the psychiatric conditions such as delusional disorders, hallucinatory behaviours, and dissociative amnesia.

Indexed as

Brain fingerprintingP300-MERMERpsychopathology

Identifiers

PMID42733387
PMCPMC13570945

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.