Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42733095›Full record

ArticleBiometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift2026

H-Likelihood Approach on the Joint Frailty Model for Clustered Bivariate Survival Data.

Jihoon Kwon, Jia-Han Shih, Takeshi Emura, Il Do Ha

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jihoon KwonDepartment of Statistics & Data Science, Pukyong National University, Busan, South Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-7670-0527
Jia-Han ShihDepartment of Applied Mathematics, National Sun Yat-sen University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Takeshi EmuraSchool of Informatics and Data Science, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3904-4014
Il Do HaDepartment of Statistics & Data Science, Pukyong National University, Busan, South Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8434-9506

Funding

MSIT RS-2026-25470161National Research Foundation of Korea
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recently, clustered bivariate survival data have been extensively studied using different modeling approaches, such as frailty models and copula models. These data can take several forms, including bivariate censored data, semicompeting risks data, and competing risks data. Traditionally, each type has been analyzed using a separate model. In this paper, we propose a unified joint frailty modeling approach that is capable of handling the three different types of clustered bivariate survival data within a single model-based likelihood framework. Here, the unknown baseline hazards in the joint frailty models are modeled based on a cubic M-spline basis function that does not require a specific parametric form. Inference for the model parameters is performed via the hierarchical likelihood (h-likelihood) method, which avoids the intractable integration over frailty required in marginal likelihood approaches and effectively captures heterogeneity across clusters. The performance of the proposed approach is evaluated through simulation studies, which demonstrate that the estimated regression coefficients appear reasonable for the three types of clustered bivariate survival data. The proposed method is further illustrated using three real-world data sets.

Indexed as

BiometryModels, StatisticalCluster AnalysisHumansLikelihood FunctionsSurvival Analysisclustered bivariate survival datacompeting‐risks datafrailty modelsH‐likelihoodM‐splinesemicompeting risks data

Identifiers

PMID42733095
PMCPMC13572571

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.