Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42733086›Full record

ArticleNature communications2026

A single computational objective can produce specialization of streams in visual cortex.

Dawn Finzi, Eshed Margalit, Kendrick Kay, Daniel L K Yamins, Kalanit Grill-Spector

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Dawn FinziDepartment of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA. finzidawn@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0636-7375
Eshed MargalitNeurosciences Graduate Program, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0841-7444
Kendrick KayCenter for Magnetic Resonance Research, Department of Radiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6604-9155
Daniel L K YaminsDepartment of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Kalanit Grill-SpectorDepartment of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5404-9606

Funding

Functional-neuroanatomy of high-level visual cortex: a quantitative multimodal approachR01EY023915 · NEI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Kalanit Grill-Spector · 2014 to 2026
$4.6M
National Science Foundation (NSF) IIS-1822929NEI NIH HHS R01 EY023915U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | National Institutes of Health (NIH) R01EY023915
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human visual cortex is organized into dorsal, lateral, and ventral streams. A long-standing hypothesis is that the functional organization into streams emerged to support distinct visual behaviors. Here, we compare neural network-based computational models against a massive fMRI dataset to investigate why visual streams emerge. We find that a self-supervised Topographic Deep Artificial Neural Network (TDANN), which encourages nearby units to respond similarly, better captures brain responses, as well as spatial segregation and functional differentiation across streams, than DANN models trained for stream-specific visual behaviors. These findings challenge the prevailing view that streams evolved to separately support different behaviors and suggest instead the possibility that functional organization can arise from a single principle: learning generally useful visual representations subject to local spatial constraints.

Indexed as

Neural Networks, ComputerVisual CortexVisual PathwaysBrain MappingComputer SimulationHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingModels, NeurologicalVisual Perception

Identifiers

PMID42733086
PMCPMC13572372

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.