ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2026
A multi-task learning-based deep learning model for precise estimation of rib fracture age on chest CT.
Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Rib fractures are a common type of chest injury, and the estimation of the fracture age mainly relies on clinical or forensic imaging experts making rough judgments based on CT scans, which is highly subjective. In recent years, artificial intelligence (AI) models have performed exceptionally well in rib fracture detection tasks, providing a potential technical foundation for inferring the time of fracture formation. Therefore, it is necessary to develop deep learning model tools to assist human judgment. In this study, a multi-task deep learning model (based on the 3D-ResNet18) was developed to predict the rib fracture age, classify their healing stages, and identify fracture types concurrently. The model was trained on a multicenter dataset comprising 1,848 rib fractures derived from chest CT scans and demonstrated generalizability in external testing. Specifically, the model achieved a mean absolute error (MAE) of 7.94 days and an accuracy (ACC) of 71.18% in the fracture age prediction and healing stage classification tasks, respectively, outperforming manual evaluation (MAE: 10.65 days). Additionally, the model achieved an ACC of 94.71% in the fracture type classification task.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42733047What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.