ArticlePsychiatry investigation2026
Daily Language as an Objective Indicator of Depressive Affective States: A Two-Week Ecological Momentary Assessment Study in Emotional Labor Workers.
Article in Psychiatry investigation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveWorkers performing emotional labor are at increased risk for depression, yet conventional self-report assessments often lack objectivity and temporal sensitivity. This study aimed to examine whether longitudinal analysis of daily natural language collected through ecological momentary assessment (EMA) can serve as an indicator of depressive affective states and to compare its temporal sensitivity with traditional self-report measures.
methodsA total of 400 call center employees completed three voice-recorded free-text entries per day for two weeks using an EMA application. Transcriptions were analyzed using a lexicon-based sentiment approach (Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count [LIWC]) and three large language models (LLMs; GPT-4o-mini, Qwen, and Mistral) under zero-shot prompting. Depressive symptoms were assessed using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9, and neuroticism was measured using both self-reported questionnaires and language-inferred scores.
resultsLLM-derived sentiment scores significantly differentiated groups across levels of depressive symptom burden and consistently outperformed LIWC. Longitudinal analyses demonstrated clear group-level separation, particularly in morning entries, whereas self-reported mood ratings failed to distinguish groups and showed lower adherence over the two-week period. Language-inferred neuroticism exhibited stronger associations with depressive symptoms than self-reported neuroticism. A cumulative model based on morning sentiment scores showed progressively improved discrimination over time, reaching its highest performance on Day 10 (area under the curve=0.75).
conclusionDaily natural language captures meaningful longitudinal affective dynamics associated with depressive symptoms and may complement conventional self-report assessments as a low-burden and scalable indicator of depressive affective states in real-world occupational settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.