ArticleCancer science2026
Integrated Analysis of HER2 Expression and ERBB2 Alterations in Bladder Cancer.
Article in Cancer science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) has emerged as a potential therapeutic target in bladder cancer (BC), particularly with the advent of next-generation antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) like trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd). However, the complex relationship between HER2 protein expression, genetic status, and clinical outcomes remains incompletely understood. We conducted an integrated multi-omics analysis of 445 BC cases (306 muscle-invasive [MIBC] and 139 non-muscle-invasive [NMIBC]) from the OMPU-NCC cohort, a uniform Japanese clinical database. The study utilized whole-exome sequencing, RNA sequencing, and refined HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) scoring. HER2 IHC positivity (1+/2+/3+) was identified in 30.1% of the cohort. An additional 8.5% exhibited faint membrane staining despite being IHC 0, indicating that detectable HER2 membrane staining was present in approximately 38.5% of cases. HER2 IHC scores showed no prognostic value, whereas ERBB2 amplification, detected in 7.8% of cases, was associated with poorer survival and remained an independent adverse prognostic factor in multivariable analysis (HR, 1.76; 95% CI: 1.08-2.87). ERBB2 amplification was accompanied by frequent co-amplification of genes within the 17q12 amplicon, including GRB7, MIEN1, and PGAP3. Molecular subtyping revealed that ERBB2 amplification was enriched in the Luminal Unstable (LumU) subtype. In contrast, detectable HER2 membrane staining significantly correlated with high NECTIN4 expression, indicating an overlap between tumors expressing these two ADC targets. HER2 protein expression and ERBB2 amplification represent distinct features of BC. Their integrated assessment may improve molecular stratification and guide future biomarker-driven studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.