ArticleEuropean endodontic journal2026
Corrigendum to Influence of Different Post-endodontic Restorations on the Survival Rate Against Fracture of Endodontically Treated Anterior Teeth Affected by Cervical Lesions with Pulpal Involvement: A Retrospective Clinical Study.
Article in European endodontic journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum for
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
unlabelledCorrigendum: "Influence of Different Post-endodontic Restorations on the Survival Rate Against Fracture of Endodontically Treated Anterior Teeth Affected by Cervical Lesions with Pulpal Involvement: A Retrospective Clinical Study" by Intaraprasong N, Banomyong D, Chotvorrarak K, Ngoenwiwatkul Y, Pittayachawan P. Eur Endod J 2024; 9(1) doi: 10.14744/eej.2023.15870. Upon reviewing the manuscript, the authors found that the ethics approval number was inadvertently stated incorrectly in the Materials and Methods section (page 45) and in the Disclosures, Ethics Committee Approval statement (page 55). The number that appeared in the publication (MU-DT/PY-IRB 2020/DT011) was an internal project reference number used by the administrative unit responsible for ethics oversight, rather than the official ethics approval identifier assigned by the Institutional Review Board. The correct ethics approval number is MU-DT/PY-IRB 2020/015.2802, and it has been corrected accordingly. The study was conducted under valid ethical approval, and this change does not affect the study design, methodology, data, analyses, results, or conclusions of the study. The authors apologize for this mistake. You can access the corrected version of the article through the link below: https://doi.org/10.14744/eej.2023.15870.
Identifiers
42732584What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.