ArticleJournal of religion and health2026
Sacred Burnout: A Conceptual Analysis of Religious Coping Fatigue Among Healthcare Workers in the Philippines.
Article in Journal of religion and health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Religion and spirituality may sustain healthcare workers through meaning, hope, relational connection, and vocational purpose, yet their restorative contribution may diminish under chronic and inadequately supported occupational demands. This conceptual article develops a sacred depletion process model for healthcare workers in the Philippines and proposes sacred burnout as a provisional outcome construct. Through integrative conceptual analysis, theory synthesis, and differential concept comparison, the article integrates religious coping theory with conservation of resources theory. It distinguishes the recursive sacred depletion process from the sacred burnout state and identifies reduced sacred restoration as the proposed mechanism connecting occupational resource loss with declining spiritual and vocational vitality. Sacred burnout is defined as spiritual and vocational exhaustion characterized by diminished restoration from sacred practices and meanings that remain valued within inadequately supported healthcare work. The model differentiates internalized sacred obligation from externally imposed sacred obligation and introduces institutional sacralization of sacrifice to explain how vocational, moral, religious, or heroic language may normalize excessive sacrifice or shift responsibility for unsafe working conditions to healthcare workers. It incorporates recursive relationships among boundary erosion, cumulative resource loss, sacred expectation conflict, and reduced sacred restoration while recognizing organizational, relational, psychological, and spiritual recovery pathways. Sacred burnout is distinguished provisionally from occupational burnout, compassion fatigue, moral injury, religious struggle, spiritual dryness, and depression. It is not a diagnosis, validated screening category, or measure of religious commitment. Its conceptual value depends on evidence of discriminant, incremental, and longitudinal validity. Sustainable responses require noncoercive spiritual care, differentiated psychological assessment, protected recovery, and institutional accountability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42732531What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.