ArticleJournal of religion and health2026
Pastoral Authority and Spiritual Harm: Evangelii Gaudium and an Ethics of Pastoral Responsibility in Mental Health.
Article in Journal of religion and health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pastoral care can provide meaning, consolation, and spiritual support to persons experiencing psychological distress, yet religious authority may also become a source of harm when it exceeds pastoral competence or constrains the agency of those seeking care. This conceptual article develops pastorally mediated spiritual harm as a distinct ethical category for injury arising through pastoral authority even when deliberate abuse or coercive intent is absent. Using normative conceptual reconstruction, it reads Francis's Evangelii Gaudium, especially §§169-173, as a structured account of reverence, spiritual purpose, listening, epistemic restraint, freedom, and non-intrusive service, and brings this account into dialog with empirical studies of clergy mental health literacy, religious and spiritual competence, referral, and interdisciplinary care. The analysis distinguishes pastorally mediated spiritual harm from spiritual abuse, pastoral malpractice, spiritual bypassing, negative religious coping, and ordinary pastoral limitation. It then reconstructs pastoral authority as pastoral responsibility through five interdependent duties: respect for dignity and agency, non-coercive accompaniment, epistemic humility, role and competence boundaries, and responsible referral and accountability. The framework also clarifies the distinct purposes of pastoral accompaniment, spiritual direction, pastoral counseling, psychotherapy, and psychiatric care. The article concludes that Catholic pastoral authority is ethically strengthened when accompaniment remains recognizably religious while protecting persons in distress from avoidable spiritual and psychological harm.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42732529What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.