Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42732512›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2026

Cryopreservation of Mammalian Oocytes: Slow Cooling and Vitrification Approaches.

Victoria Keros, Barry J Fuller

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Victoria KerosDepartment of Reproductive Medicine, Division of Gynecology and Reproduction, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden. victoria.keros@ki.se.
Barry J FullerDivision of Surgery & Interventional Science University College London Medical School, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Two basic methods for the laboratory-focused cryopreservation of mammalian oocytes are discussed, based initially on work with murine oocytes and subsequently transferred to human infertility services. One method uses a relatively low concentration of the cryoprotectant propanediol plus sucrose and requires controlled-rate cooling equipment to achieve a slow cooling rate. This method has also produced live births from cryopreserved human oocytes. The second method, which is described here, employs a high concentration of the cryoprotectant dimethyl sulfoxide plus a low concentration of polyethylene glycol. This is a vitrification method, which involves ultra-rapid cooling by plunging standard straws into liquid nitrogen vapor, hence avoiding the need for specialized equipment, but requires technical ability to manipulate the oocytes quickly in the highly concentrated cryoprotectant solutions. Murine oocytes that have been vitrified using this technique have resulted in live births. Vitrification using other cryoprotectant mixtures is now a clinically accepted method of choice for cryobanking of human oocytes.

Indexed as

CryopreservationCryoprotective AgentsOocytesVitrificationAnimalsDimethyl SulfoxideFemaleHumansMicePolyethylene GlycolsSucroseCryoprotective AgentsDimethyl SulfoxidePolyethylene GlycolsSucroseHumanMurineOocyteSlow-coolingVitrification

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.