Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42732492›Full record

ReviewMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2026

The Principles of Freeze-Drying and Application of Analytical Technologies.

Kevin R Ward, Paul Matejtschuk

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kevin R WardBiopharma Group, Winchester, UK. kward@biopharma.co.uk.
Paul MatejtschukFormulation Science, Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency, Potters Bar, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Freeze-drying is a complex process despite the relatively small number of steps involved, since the freezing, sublimation, desorption, and reconstitution processes all play a part in determining the success or otherwise of the final product qualities, and each stage can impose different stresses on a product. This is particularly the case with many fragile biological samples, which require great care in the selection of formulation additives such as protective agents and other stabilizers. Despite this, the process is widely used, not least because once any such processing stresses can be overcome, the result is typically a significantly more stable product than was the case with the starting material. Indeed, lyophilization may be considered a gentler method than conventional air-drying methods, which tend to apply heat to the product rather than starting by removing heat as is the case here. Additionally, due to the high surface area to volume ratio, freeze-dried materials tend to be drier than their conventionally dried counterparts and also rehydrate more rapidly. This chapter provides an overview of freeze-drying (lyophilization) of biological specimens with particular reference to the importance of formulation development, characterization, and cycle development factors necessary for the commercial exploitation of freeze-dried products and reviews the recent developments in analytical methods which have come to underpin modern freeze-drying practice.

Indexed as

AnimalsFreeze DryingHumansFreeze-dryingFreeze drying microscopyLyophilizationLyoprotectantsProcess analytical technologySublimationThermal analysis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.