Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42732394›Full record

ArticleJournal of surgical case reports2026

A forgotten disease revisited: giant bladder stone in a modern clinical setting case report.

Christian Nurtanto Putra, Rinto Hariwibowo, Nurul Akbar

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of surgical case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Christian Nurtanto PutraDepartment of Urology, Cipto Mangunkusumo National Central General Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta 10430, Indonesia.
Rinto HariwibowoDivision of Urology, Koja Regional General Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta 14220, Indonesia.
Nurul AkbarDivision of Urology, Koja Regional General Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta 14220, Indonesia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Giant bladder stones are an uncommon entity in modern urological practice that developed secondary to longstanding bladder outlet obstruction, chronic infection, or neurogenic dysfunction. A 37-year-old male presented with a long-standing history of lower urinary tract symptoms. A non-contrast computed tomography scan revealed a giant intravesical calculus. The patient underwent open cystolithotomy and the stone weighing 1200 g was successfully extracted. The postoperative course was uneventful with a full recovery after 1 month. Comprehensive evaluation with laboratory testing, imaging, and cystoscopy is essential for accurate assessment and operative planning of giant bladder stones. Management should be individualized. Open vesicolithotomy remains a dependable and definitive approach, especially when complete clearance in a single session is required or endoscopic resources are limited. While minimally invasive techniques represent the standard for most bladder stone patients, vesicolithotomy remains an indispensable option in the armamentarium of giant bladder stone management.

Indexed as

case reportgiant bladder stonerare case

Identifiers

PMID42732394
PMCPMC13570641

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.