ArticleJournal of surgical case reports2026
A forgotten disease revisited: giant bladder stone in a modern clinical setting case report.
Article in Journal of surgical case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Giant bladder stones are an uncommon entity in modern urological practice that developed secondary to longstanding bladder outlet obstruction, chronic infection, or neurogenic dysfunction. A 37-year-old male presented with a long-standing history of lower urinary tract symptoms. A non-contrast computed tomography scan revealed a giant intravesical calculus. The patient underwent open cystolithotomy and the stone weighing 1200 g was successfully extracted. The postoperative course was uneventful with a full recovery after 1 month. Comprehensive evaluation with laboratory testing, imaging, and cystoscopy is essential for accurate assessment and operative planning of giant bladder stones. Management should be individualized. Open vesicolithotomy remains a dependable and definitive approach, especially when complete clearance in a single session is required or endoscopic resources are limited. While minimally invasive techniques represent the standard for most bladder stone patients, vesicolithotomy remains an indispensable option in the armamentarium of giant bladder stone management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.