ReviewCureus2026
Early Recognition of Neuroleptic Malignant Syndrome Without Hyperthermia: A Narrative Review.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neuroleptic malignant syndrome (NMS) is a rare but potentially fatal idiosyncratic reaction to dopamine antagonism, traditionally recognised by hyperthermia, muscular rigidity, autonomic instability, and altered mental status. International consensus and DSM-5 research criteria uniformly require documented repeated hyperthermia to establish a diagnosis. Primary cohort, case-register, pharmacovigilance, and clinical-feature-frequency data document that a clinically important minority of diagnosed patients are afebrile at presentation, and that rigidity precedes measured hyperthermia in the majority who eventually become febrile. This review synthesises the evidence bearing on early recognition of NMS in patients who do not yet meet the fever criterion, and asks what earlier markers, clinical patterns, and management steps are supported by primary evidence. Feature-frequency series show that rigidity and rising creatine kinase (CK) are earlier and more universal markers than measured hyperthermia; pathophysiological modelling is consistent with the view that hyperthermia is a downstream and variable manifestation of the underlying pathophysiological process; and outcome data indicate that delayed recognition tracks with the leading causes of death and disability (respiratory failure, acute kidney injury, rhabdomyolysis). Because all available evidence is retrospective, cohort, pharmacovigilance, or observational in design, conclusions are directional rather than definitive. Awareness of the afebrile presentation, structured attention to rigidity and CK trajectory, and early exclusion of alternative diagnoses are supported by the primary literature as low-cost strategies to shorten the time to recognition. Formal criteria are unchanged; the change proposed here is one of clinical awareness at the bedside.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.