ArticleCureus2026
The Virtual Fracture Clinic Bottleneck: A Single-Centre Service Evaluation of Compliance With British Orthopaedic Association Surgical Timing Standards for Distal Radius Fixation.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDistal radius fractures are common trauma presentations. The British Orthopaedic Association Standards for Trauma (BOAST) guidelines mandate surgical fixation within 72 hours for unstable intra-articular fractures and within seven days for extra-articular fractures. Virtual fracture clinics (VFCs) are now the dominant National Health Service (NHS) triage model, but their effect on time-critical surgical decision-making is unclear. This service evaluation assessed whether the VFC pathway delays operative management of distal radius fractures relative to BOAST standards, compared with traditional trauma-meeting triage.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective service evaluation of adult patients undergoing open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of a distal radius fracture over seven months at Lincoln County Hospital, United Lincolnshire Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Lincoln, England, United Kingdom. Patients were stratified by triage route (VFC vs. traditional trauma meeting) and fracture morphology. BOAST compliance was compared between pathways using Fisher's exact test, with odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
resultsOf 25 ORIF cases, 92% (23/25) were intra-articular. Overall BOAST compliance was 12% (3/25). Compliance was 0% (0/17) in the VFC cohort versus 37.5% (3/8) in the traditional trauma-meeting cohort (Fisher's exact p = 0.0243; OR 0.045, 95% CI 0.002-0.93).
conclusionThe VFC pathway was associated with significantly reduced BOAST-compliant surgical timing. This association may in part reflect an additional clinic step prior to listing, although causation cannot be established from this retrospective design; the findings should be regarded as hypothesis-generating. Departments using VFC pathways should consider a direct-listing escalation protocol for fractures meeting operative criteria, to avoid breaching hyper-acute BOAST windows.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.