Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42732268›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the ... Workshop on Patient-Oriented Language Processing2025

Mining Social Media for Barriers to Opioid Recovery with LLMs.

Vinu H Ekanayake, Md Sultan Al Nahian, Ramakanth Kavuluru

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the ... Workshop on Patient-Oriented Language Processing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Vinu H EkanayakeUniversity of Kentucky, Lexington, KY USA.
Md Sultan Al NahianUniversity of Kentucky, Lexington, KY USA.
Ramakanth KavuluruUniversity of Kentucky, Lexington, KY USA.

Funding

Fast and fine: NLP methods for near real-time and fine-grained overdose surveillanceR01DA057686 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI KAVULURU, VENKATA NAGA RAMAKANTH · 2022 to 2025
$1.7M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA057686
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Opioid abuse and addiction remain a major public health challenge in the US. At a broad level, barriers to recovery often take the form of individual, social, and structural issues. However, it is crucial to know the specific barriers patients face to help design better treatment interventions and healthcare policies. Researchers typically discover barriers through focus groups and surveys. While scientists can exercise better control over these strategies, such methods are both expensive and time consuming, needing repeated studies across time as new barriers emerge. We believe, this traditional approach can be complemented by automatically mining social media to determine high-level trends in both well-known and emerging barriers. In this paper, we report on such an effort by mining messages from the r/OpiatesRecovery subreddit to extract, classify, and examine barriers to opioid recovery, with special attention to the COVID-19 pandemic's impact. Our methods involve multi-stage prompting to arrive at barriers from each post and map them to existing barriers or identify new ones. The new barriers are refined into coherent categories using embedding-based similarity measures and hierarchical clustering. Temporal analysis shows that some stigma-related barriers declined (relative to pre-pandemic), whereas systemic obstacles-such as treatment discontinuity and exclusionary practices-rose significantly during the pandemic. Our method is general enough to be applied to barrier extraction for other substance abuse scenarios (e.g., alcohol or stimulants).

Identifiers

PMID42732268
PMCPMC13570455

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.