ArticleDepression and anxiety2026
Mapping Sex Differences in Depression, Anxiety, and Co-Occurring Symptoms in Adults Under Stress: A Bayesian Network Approach.
Article in Depression and anxiety, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Sex differences in the prevalence and presentation of depression and anxiety are well-established, yet disparities in the underlying network structure and potential causal relationships between symptoms, particularly under significant stress, remain less understood. Understanding these network differences is crucial for elucidating mechanisms and tailoring interventions. This study explored sex differences in the network structure of depression, anxiety, and co-occurring symptoms (posttraumatic stress disorder [PTSD] symptoms, insomnia, and fear reactions) in an adult population. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among adults ( Results: Distinct sex-specific symptom network patterns emerged. Anxiety and intrusion symptoms were most central for women, while depression was most central for men. Overall network connectivity was significantly higher in women. Critically, BN analysis identified a more complex architecture of probabilistic dependencies in women, evidenced by a greater number of directed edges compared to men. The men's DAG indicated a relatively sparse structure with fewer directional pathways between symptoms. Conclusions: Men and women exhibited distinct distress symptom network structures under acute stress. Specifically, anxiety and intrusion emerged as central nodes in women, indicating that they may represent promising intervention targets to prevent symptom escalation, while depressive symptoms were more central to men. These findings highlight the importance of sex-sensitive psychological first aid during public health crises and establish an empirical foundation for the development of sex-informed, process-oriented interventions in future research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.