ArticleGeoHealth2026
Who Can Avoid the Heat? Inter-Individual Differences in 24-hr Heat Exposure Reveal Disparities in Heat Adaptation and Stress.
Article in GeoHealth, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Differences in adaptive capacity and sensitivity shape behavioral and physiological responses to overheated environments, which are associated with unequal personal heat exposure (PHE). Although growing evidence documents heterogeneity in PHE across regions and populations, studies rarely examine how adaptive factors influence sub-daily exposure patterns and resulting heat stress relative to regional heat. This study assesses intra- and inter-individual variation in 24-hr PHE and heat loads using regional weather as a non-behavioral baseline. We studied 34 adults aged 45-74 from diverse socioeconomic, occupational, and housing backgrounds in the Phoenix Metropolitan Area. Using the HeatSuite™ system and Kestrel Drop D2 sensors, we monitored 10-min indoor and on-body ambient conditions over 21-day periods during summer 2024, reconstructing PHE based on participants' locations. We used Generalized Additive Models to explain inter-individual differences and Linear Mixed Models to examine associations with vulnerability features. Heat stress was assessed using a physiology-based human heat balance model. Results reveal significant inter-individual differences in individually experienced temperatures (IET) and humidities (IEH), with three sub-daily patterns emerging: highest overall exposures, strong diurnal amplitude, and day-long stable exposures. Median IET and IEH were 25.9°C and 1.4 kPa, with maxima reaching 47.5°C and 5.1 kPa. On average, participants experienced temperatures 10.4°C below regional conditions, with low evaporative cooling requirements to attain heat balance for sedentary activities. However, participants with income <$40k/year experienced higher peak daily temperatures. These findings demonstrate how high-resolution personal monitoring reveals when and why heat interventions may be most effective, informing policy with locally-grounded evidence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.