ReviewFood science & nutrition2026
Herbal Extracts and Plant-Derived Bioactives in Atopic Dermatitis: Evidence, Mechanisms, Pediatric Safety, and Translational Priorities.
Review in Food science & nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic, relapsing epithelial and neuroimmune disease in which barrier failure, type 2 inflammation, microbial dysbiosis, itching, metabolism, and environmental exposures reinforce one another. This review critically synthesizes clinical and preclinical evidence for herbal medicines, standardized extracts, food-derived bioactives, functional-food candidates, nutraceutical ingredients, and natural-product delivery systems in AD, with particular attention to pediatric safety. Recurrent experimental signals include attenuation of Th2 cytokines and IgE, suppression of mast-cell and IL-31-related itch pathways, restoration of filaggrin and tight-junction proteins, and modulation of MAPK/NF-κB, JAK/STAT, Nrf2/HO-1, and NLRP3 signaling. However, efficacy is not inferred from pathway changes alone. Human evidence remains heterogeneous, and apparently promising agents have failed to outperform active comparators, produced neutral microbiome results, or raised barrier and sensitization concerns. We therefore integrate four issues that are often treated separately: food sources and processing-dependent chemistry; oral bioaccessibility and food-matrix effects; gut-skin signaling and its uncertain causal direction; and compatibility with standard topical agents, cyclosporine, biologics, and JAK inhibitors. The evidence supports selected botanicals as investigational adjuncts rather than as replacements for guideline-based care. Translation requires authenticated materials, quantitative chemical fingerprints, exposure-response studies, age-appropriate safety surveillance, interaction assessment, and controlled trials using validated clinical and barrier endpoints.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.