ArticleCase reports in dentistry2026
Peripheral Giant Cell Granuloma Mimicking Central Giant Cell Granuloma in a Pediatric Patient: A Diagnostic Challenge.
Article in Case reports in dentistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Peripheral giant cell granuloma (PGCG) is a benign reactive lesion that typically arises from the gingiva or edentulous alveolar ridge. Although superficial pressure resorption of the underlying bone has been described, extensive cortical erosion mimicking a central giant cell granuloma (CGCG) is exceptionally uncommon, particularly in pediatric patients, creating a significant diagnostic challenge. Case Presentation: A 10-year-old boy presented with an exophytic gingival mass involving the right mandibular alveolar ridge. Although the lesion appeared clinically peripheral, cone-beam computed tomography demonstrated a 40 × 25 mm expansile osteolytic lesion with cortical bone erosion, involvement of adjacent developing teeth, and imaging findings suggestive of CGCG. Incisional biopsy revealed features consistent with PGCG. Laboratory investigations, including serum calcium, phosphorus, alkaline phosphatase, and parathyroid hormone levels, were within normal limits, excluding hyperparathyroidism. Complete surgical excision with peripheral osteotomy was performed under general anesthesia, and histopathological examination of the excised specimen confirmed the diagnosis of PGCG. Conclusion: This case illustrates that PGCG may rarely present with cortical bone erosion and radiographic findings closely resembling CGCG. Accurate diagnosis requires integration of clinical examination, advanced imaging, histopathological evaluation, and laboratory investigations rather than reliance on a single diagnostic modality. Recognition of this uncommon presentation may prevent misdiagnosis and avoid unnecessarily aggressive treatment in pediatric patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.